92tillinfinity (August 29, 2008 at 4:39 pm)

ur comp blows mine is waaay better i can play half-life on 640x820 resolution

Onebloodygrenade (August 26, 2008 at 7:43 pm)

Until they stick some ddr5 on their (much faster) chip.

Dmk998 (August 20, 2008 at 3:32 pm)

hhahaahaa look at your pc no one want a pc with fans evry where loooool but anyway it's a nice video shouwing what the ati graphics cards can do and can do better than any Nvidia card!!!! great video dude

merolleiro (August 19, 2008 at 7:17 pm)

but q6600 can be pushed further with OC

merolleiro (August 19, 2008 at 7:14 pm)

4,5 ghz are kinda useless here, since @that resolution the game is mostly GPU dependant. Any improvement over 3ghz will be useless.

Adamtron530 (August 18, 2008 at 9:45 pm)

about 13 inches

guarana80 (August 14, 2008 at 10:22 pm)

Look at all the Nvidia fanboys. It reminds me when 3DFX were getting there ass whipped by Nvidia and they went bust. Looks like Nvidia is heading the same way with there overpriced junk.

Jeebus84 (August 11, 2008 at 10:06 pm)

The 3870X2 is 15% slower than 9800GX2,but the 9800GX2 costs more(3870X2 = £150 ,9800GX2 = £217) Is it worth paying roughly an extra 40% on a 9800GX2 for an extra 15% gain in performance over a 3870X2?Hell no!! You can even buy a 4870 for £175,still alot cheaper than a 9800GX2 or GTX260/280 And its only 11% slower than the 9800GX2 and 13% slower than the big bad GTX280(costs £250 btw),isnt it glaringly obvious who is giving better value for money when it comes to graphics cards these days?

Dominionlord (August 10, 2008 at 10:03 am)

nVidia has more employees and Ati not(not as much as nvidia) and Ati is sparing it's best for incoming games(Just what i've heard)

sashaalx03 (August 9, 2008 at 6:19 am)

and what are ur reasons? why ATI sucks ? in case you haven't noticed nvidia dropped the price massively on all its cards showing how much profit they got, and how overpriced their cards were