|
ChipProcessor32 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@qpwnsall,
No its not. And we don't know how "wide" an atom is. We can only use quantum mech to estimate the probability an electron is hovering in a certain point. The ion used to dope the substrate would be the "size" of an "atom". And there's no reason to build so small.
qpwnsall (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
is it possible to make 1 atom wide transistors?
rampagerampage (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It`s not an american innovation , it`s an international innovation , you go ahead and go to NASA INTEL and Microsoft , and see the procentage of non-americans working there
mchou2002 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Good ole american innovation.
87655788 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
amazing great job intel
cchderrick (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and Robert Noyce.
thiaguwinid (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
useful for my student. thankyou
madamerotten (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think he was talking about transistors actually in an integrated structure. But even then, the very first IC was indeed a germanium one, made by Jack Kilby in 1958.
pcwizardz (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Biggest change to transistor in 40 years,`yeah sure, but why are your desktop cpus inefficient power drainers Intel hasn't even made a single desktop chip that can idle under 10 watts without that junk speedstep laggy function wich has an unacceptable latency start up problem! speed step makes a pc hang! Why cant you guys just make efficient atom chips and power efficient motherboards for DESKTOPS your quads and duos cost 20$/30$ a month extra doing squat in idle ! whats up with that
SkyDiver17 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ok I will write you a message in an 2 hours |
