|
rafaelcalsaverini (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No it isn't!!!
ojayistocute (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
iam doing a project on this but it doesnt tell me about cold fusion.....that was a waste of time!
NukeNEWZEALAND (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
no not really
dividebyN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
M.O.T. + tinfoil......lol
rrsquez (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
To all of the Idiots trying to prove thier idea:
1) Make your idea a self-sustaining closed-loop system! Show all POWER IN and POWER OUT. Show it and explain all in the video rather than no-audio, or musical background.
2) Let us see your data! We live in a CGI world.
3) Let someone reproduce your experiment with and/or without your help.
So far, all I've ever seen is FRAUD science on "youtube". How I'd like to see something genuine!
kennygross311 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
sounds like something pink floyd would use as an intro to a song lol
JonThm (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
'cold fusion' is very weak. Do steam, molecular, nuclear fusion instead!
deathsonic19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
n
e
r
d
th3d3wd3r (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Why would it have anything to do with ITER? ITER uses a tokamak reactor. Tokamaks do produce neutrons through fusion. This video is extremely questionable. I've not read one single paper that confirms a single sucessful reproduction of cold fusion and neutrons detected were not above background.
magnum9987 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Pics, or i didn't happen you lying SOB. COLD FUSION doesn't happen. If you did it once, you should do it again, with a camera. And if you can replicate the results at least three times, then, you will have consistent results, and prove cold fusion. But, you won't be able to, as this thing doesnt happen. |