|
001180felipe (September 20, 2007 at 6:32 am)
read my post from older to new
001180felipe (September 20, 2007 at 6:32 am)
Felipe Bouroncle. (English as a second language sorry)
P.s "Science uses facts (some times facts changes" The bible pages have to be historically proven to make them in the book. But let me ask you my friend: Can you prove that napoleon existed with the scientific method? NO You rely in historic documents. A lot of the bible is an accurate account of history, some is prophecy, some are poetry and so forth.
001180felipe (September 20, 2007 at 6:31 am)
It has taught me to love my brothers and sisters, to really know what is to love my wife and have great intimacy an much more. Science is so amazing because it is made by god. Scientific "facts" change over time when new discoveries are made by the love of god and guidance never does. There will always be great mysteries for science to unravel but the depths of a mans heart our own heart can only be discovered by the bible.
001180felipe (September 20, 2007 at 6:30 am)
Well let me explain to you all. 2062299953 . Science is amazing it has taught me many thing it can teach my an unlimited amount of information. God has taught me things science could never teach me.
rgaskey (August 23, 2007 at 12:05 am)
A good video! Watch it again, and we can only conclude, if the timeline is correct, that homo sapiens spent about 150,000 years poking in the ground with a stick. From man's first appearance, did evolution accelerate tremendously? Also from a consideration of known history and technological discovery, this must be true. Unless, you happen to believe in Divine Creation.
krew1618 (August 8, 2007 at 9:57 am)
A different truth? What possible truth could be derived from scripture? It is scientifically way off the mark. It is historically inaccurate. It is internally contradictory. A lot of the moral precepts are abominable. It is largely a work of fiction. If people read it as such good and well, but some people believe it is the literal instructions sent from god and it is usually followed by the most barbarous atrocities.
baronsabato (August 8, 2007 at 6:26 am)
As an evolutionary biologist and a Christian, I gotta disagree with you here. Scripture is not false, it simply describes truth differently than science. Stephen Jay Gould, one of the most influential evolutionary biologists (actually a paleontologist) wrote an excellent book on the relationship between science and religion called "Rocks of Ages". Gould was, by the way, an atheist.
flyingscience (July 18, 2007 at 12:11 pm)
AIG Creation Museum refuted by fossils below museum pt.2 Paste that title in the search engine box to see my new video . Part 1 is on many science news web sites and religous forums.
Philos2006 (July 18, 2007 at 1:43 am)
Its useless to argue with people who only find truth in their holy books.
krew1618 (July 11, 2007 at 3:23 pm)
As with all religious apologetics there is no reconciliation between what is now known to be true and what is written in the holy texts. They are irreconcilable because ancient men who did not know better wrote the texts. The texts are quite obviously false. Keep religion far away from science. |
