|
kustomcougar (October 11, 2008 at 7:54 am)
you are such a faggot
dbui72 (October 4, 2008 at 2:15 pm)
I think it is impractical to implement into production with the liability myself. It will be one more thing consumers have to worry about, plus I have seen videos of some exploding while in the car. But really am skeptical as well, but I have an open mind. I think if it can do something with the extra juice, then why not. Just dont know.
moneyman10k (September 25, 2008 at 7:51 pm)
you are wrong and you don't know why. why doesn't every car do this if it is so easy and cheap to more than double the efficiency of the car? do you think there is a conspiracy?
LBpDC (September 25, 2008 at 6:47 pm)
Do some research Einstein, this has been around for a very long time. BMW even has a vehicle running off a similar concept.
eautocad (September 24, 2008 at 2:19 am)
I developed a intercooler spray that helps with MPG, HP, and tq on turbo vehicles. Check it out on my channel!
moneyman10k (September 23, 2008 at 5:54 am)
are you joking, this is fake...
beatfreakish (September 14, 2008 at 7:57 am)
In case you missed the point. 60 mpg is much better than 40 mpg
finemofok (September 9, 2008 at 6:44 pm)
Does this work on all cars and trucks? How did you make it and hook it up to?
kayakdad325 (September 7, 2008 at 12:50 pm)
Our 95 escort wagon gets 35 mpg stock.We are working on adding an hho generator. I assume smaller cars don't need as much HHO. How many LPM of HHO is your output? What kind of set up are you using in your generator?
Thanks
green95gt (September 3, 2008 at 3:14 pm)
Einstein was both amusing and outspoken...dumbass. Motha' f'in hozer. |