|
Zeezy (July 16, 2008 at 1:41 am)
Ahhh... nothing like an $8000 digital camera. :)
Zeezy (July 16, 2008 at 1:37 am)
lol If you think that's crazy, you should see how much it costs.
bozozclown (July 8, 2008 at 12:35 am)
Take a look next time you see a bunch of photographers at a sporting event ... all those giant off-white lenses are Canon.
tuber9876543 (July 5, 2008 at 10:57 pm)
A great camera, sure, but that is one ugly, ugly, ugly piece of equipment. Canon should have hired someone as good as Giorgetto Giugaro!
Siowish (June 24, 2008 at 6:00 pm)
holy crap 21 megapixel!! that's whack!!
rockvideos81 (June 21, 2008 at 9:31 pm)
"but its one hell of a camera"
damn right it is :-)
rockvideos81 (June 19, 2008 at 3:54 pm)
"mmmmm, camera porn - just the way I like it...."
LOL LOL!!
AndyBJ (June 17, 2008 at 5:29 pm)
mmmmm, camera porn - just the way I like it....
0zgon (June 13, 2008 at 3:42 pm)
Isn't it the other way around? Nikons have for eons been associated with fast action sports and photojournalism, whereas Canon are more for studio and fashon.
lca5150 (June 10, 2008 at 8:01 am)
I have the 1Ds Mark II and its amazing. I can't even imagine the quality of the Mark III |
