|
jogikana32 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No, that's it! I've never been trained in Bach, countersubjects, no idea, never had music classes for classical music, found it too expensive. Just some chords when I was younger. I find it hard to read scores as well. I puzzle and memorize. Only strong motivation brings me to play many of these fuges, for 10 years already. I find them wonderful, they never bore, and indeed very logical. So to answer your last question: I don't know.
jogikana32 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No, that's it! I've never been trained in Bach, countersubjects, no idea, never had music classes for classical music, found it too expensive. Just some chords when I was younger. I find it hard to read scores as well. I puzzle and memorize. Only strong motivation brings me to play many of these fuges, for 10 years already. I find them wonderful, they never bore, and indeed very logical. So to answer your last question: I don't know.
wcbroccoli (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well, you could just look at the keyboard score to see the entrances of the different subjects/countersubjects in various parts. Do you know the subjects/countersubjects?
BTW, you don't always want to stress every entrance. What do you do when all 3 subjects occur together?
thegoddescomposer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the fuga sounds great
RURGAN3556 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It is difficukt for piano ,in many-voice-parts. One problem is that vocal-software is ot good in bass-part, as in alto-soprano.
jogikana32 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No; I am trying to play this 5 voice fugue on piano and this computer version really helps a lot you know? Because it uses 5 clearly different voices, and now I know when a new voice begins (which needs emphasis on piano). Indeed it sounds crazy, but it's good for study-purposes. Wonder if there is an orchestra version for fugue 849.
takonypooc (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
maybe You should not to deflower the original version... |
