|
StoogeWatcher (June 29, 2008 at 1:00 pm)
Yeah, let Berkeley pay for its own overpriced 'organic' lunches!
rodneykingman (June 25, 2008 at 4:04 am)
Berkeley has not, can not, and never will be "sanctioned." They pay state, city, county and federal taxes so they deserve the money. Using the word "sanctioned" against a any city anywhere in the US no matter the actions of said city or people is nothing other than fascist. You are a fascist. This is the US. If you don't love it and all it's tax paying citizens and our freedoms get the fuck out you fascist motherfucker. I am sure you will be more than welcome in Iraq...
StoogeWatcher (June 24, 2008 at 11:36 am)
The point of sanctioning Berkeley is that if Berkeley won't support American soldiers, then they don't deserve American government dollars and that could be in the tens of millions.
rodneykingman (April 21, 2008 at 7:35 am)
That's not what I mean. You seem (by your statement) to be subscribe to the common fanatic far-right-wing-nut job neo-con fascist belief that Berkeley should be sanctioned like they tried (& miserably failed) to do at the state & federal levels. I am saying that it is impossible to take money/sanction Berkeley because they pay tax. So this money cannot be taken away because they pay into it. The millions they get a year (for schools, transportation, etc) is rightfully theirs & always will be.
Hudd1950 (April 15, 2008 at 9:40 am)
To prevent another from free movement is a form of assault. Nothing code pink does makes sense to me.
Hudd1950 (April 14, 2008 at 8:29 am)
Berkeley can and should raise their own money--how about it, you bunch of silly bastards?
Hudd1950 (April 14, 2008 at 8:27 am)
Is is not assault to prevent another from going where he or she wants to? If it were me, I'd have to make them get out of my way and I have every right to do so--with whatever means is necessary.
clmoore7a (April 13, 2008 at 8:09 pm)
Thank goodness! An elected official who tells it the way it is. |